ISSN 2050-5337 - ISSUE 6            Find us in EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate Collection

Text Size
Friday, 25 July 2014 16:51

Creativity Implementation in Teaching Featured

Written by

What are the factors contributing to the constraints on creativity implementation in teaching within higher education? This contribution briefly explores some answers to this question drawing on research based on an interdisciplinary collaborative enquiry group in the National University of Ireland, Galway. It also points out some implications for education policy.

Key words:

Creativity, higher education, constraints, education policy, social imaginary, interdisciplinarity, change


In the context of great social and economic change, creativity in higher education teaching has become, over the last decade or so, a fundamental political concern. Top-down instrumentalist policy discourses about creativity are however often disconnected from the reality of teaching practices within universities and hardly implemented on the ground. Some researchers (e.g. Craft, 2005; Craft & Jeffrey, 2008; Moran, 2010) have already investigated factors contributing to confinement on creativity in teaching and learning within schools. However, few investigations, of which Fryer (2006) is one example, have been made on creative teaching confinement specifically within higher education, notably in the Irish system.

Drawing on research based on an interdisciplinary collaborative enquiry group in the National University of Ireland, Galway, this contribution offers a combination of empirical and theoretical findings to explain some limitations to creativity implementation in teaching practices within higher education. The research revealed that academics' perceptions of the constraints on their creative teaching is not entirely coherent with the reality of their practices. Castoriadis' (2007) conception of the social imaginary is used to examine the relationship academics have with their disciplines, and how it can contribute to creativity confinement. The contribution also stresses the potential of interdisciplinary collaborative groups, as part of staff development programmes, to encourage change in academic practices towards more creativity, and ultimately to support the critical enquiry role of the university. Finally, some implications for efficient education policy on creativity are developed.

To read the rest of this article you will need to register or subscribe.
It's quick and it's currently free for individuals. Click here to subscribe >>

If you already have a subscription you can login at the top of the page.

Your subscription helps support the non-profit Creativity & Human Development eJournal project, run by UK charity The Creativity Centre Educational Trust.


Aurelie Boulos

Dr. Aurélie Boulos is an academic staff developer in the Teaching and Learning Innovation Unit entitled 'Service d’Accompagnement aux Pédagogies Innovantes et à l’Enseignement Numérique’ (SAPIENS) of the ‘Sorbonne Paris Cité’ University (USPC) (France). Her main role is to support academics of USPC in enhancing innovative and creative teaching practices and developing research projects in the field of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.

She holds an undergraduate degree from Sciences Po Rennes (France), a MA in European Studies from the University of Exeter (UK), and a PhD in higher education research from the National University of Ireland, Galway (Ireland).

Her PhD research explored constraints on academic interdisciplinary and creative practices within HE. Aurélie has a strong interest in the transformative value of creativity within HE and society in general.

She has previously worked for the Directorates for Education of UNESCO, OECD, and the European Commission in which she contributed to various EU initiatives such as ‘Opening Up education’ and the programme ‘Erasmus +’ (2014-2020).

Login to post comments

Member login

Popular articles

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3



Login here if you have an account or click below to create an account.